topic is an Audit proposal regarding the management of new-onset T2DM. • The a

topic is an Audit proposal regarding the management of new-onset T2DM.
• The audit proposal part is a future plan, so it should be written in the future tense.
• The proposal part must be written to the third person, while reflection part should be written in the first person.
Design: retrospective and multicentric.
Setting: Primary care surrounding the University of Chester.
NICE GUIDELINES surrounding the available Standard about management of type 2 diabetes
All the method slides for your proposal including What are the three standards that you are auditing against and the reference of these standards.
the font size should not be smaller than 18
This is a PPT presentation so the slides should not be wordy, try to use diagram, tables, and visual aids whenever convenient. N: B The assessment is 4000 words equivalent.
• The number of the sides in the whole presentation should be from 15-18 slides.
– The recommended structure of the PPT is below. Also, refer to the PowerPoint template on the Moodle page and the PowerPoint must covers two key points: the proposal part and the reflection part, as shown below.
Part1: audit proposal, it should cover the following
1- Title: Give your audit a clear title that describes what is being audited
2- Introduction: background, rational for the audit, aim and objectives, supported by relevant evidence.
3- Proposed method should include
• types of patients’ data included and the team involved. Inclusion criteria and exceptions
• Participants (team involved in data collection)
• Data collected:
What data will be collected? (i.e. clear definition of each data that will be collected); how the data will be measured; who will collect this data. Is it a prospective or a retrospective audit?
• The audit criteria: select 3-4 criteria and justify the selection of these criteria using evidence from literature.
• The audit standards: you need to find a standard for each selected criterion, and you need to have, the recommended percentages of compliance foreach selected standard and the reference for this standard need to be clear.
• Data analysis How data will be analysed or how you will compare between the collected data and the standard.
• Discussion
The discussion should cover the following:
Why the result of this audit will be important?
What could be the potential reasons that the current audit meet/did not meet the standards?
Are there any other published audits that has been done about the same topic?
What are the challenges that might prevent the full compliance with the recommended standards?
• Action Plan
What are the changes that could be done in the practice to meet the standards, this must be supported by evidence from literature?
Part2: reflection on your own experience, it should cover the following.
Introduction
Provide a short background about the group you are working in, what have you done in your group;
what is the reflective model you will use and why? Don’t forget to add the reference for the reflection model you will use.
Feeling:
Describe the different feeling you experienced at different stage of working in your team- dose this feeling discussed previously in literature
Evaluation:
Evaluate your experience working in your team, what went very well and what needs improvement.
Analysis:
why you think some aspects in your experience worked and others doesn’t work or needs improvement? Your analysis should be critical and it should be supported by evidence form literature (references).
Conclusion:
What have you learned from this experience?
Action plan:
If you came across the same experience again, what you will do differently and why? Support your answers with evidence from literature (references).
The evaluation and analysis slides from your reflection part.