Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects.
http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
1.Describe (in a paragraph) the findings of two previous researchers (pick only one experiment from each paper below)
Paper 1 (found in the “files folder”): Judd, C. H. (1899). A study of geometrical illusions. Psychological Review, 6(3), 241-261.
Paper 2 (found in the ‘files folder”): Pinter, R., & Anderson, M. M. (1916). The Müller-Lyer illusion with children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1(3), 200-210.
2. Describe in your own words the procedures of your experiment (what was done, what you asked your participants to do, and to who).
3. Describe the findings of your experiment (Do five trials and include the mean values for the five trials). Also put in your mean values in the shared Google Sheet called “Muller Lyer”, please collect the data and share before 2/28/23 so others can write their paper).
4. Based on the class data, try to create an explanation for why the illusion was weaker for one of the variants than it was for the classic illusion
5. Describe Richard Gregoryâs theory of the Muller-Lyer illusion. Do our results support his theory? Explain.
6. What would you do to extend our study and why?
Use this website to collect data on 5 subjects. http://elvers.us/perception/ml/
Need help Working on This or a Similar Assignment?
We specialize in custom-written, original papers. No prewritten essays here—order your plagiarism-free and AI-free paper today for guaranteed originality.