A chart detailing the client’s ACEs, the associated short and long-term outcomes

A chart detailing the client’s ACEs, the associated short and long-term outcomes of those ACEs, and protective factors the client experienced.
Then, the paper will have a minimum of four (4) pages of content/body, not including the title page, reference page, and chart of developmental factors and linkages.
Formatted in APA style.
Citations should come from readings assigned in the course (the Berk textbook, CDC links, and/or the Felitti et al. (1997) study) and at least 1 additional scholarly source.
A minimum of 8 in-text citations are required in the paper. A chart detailing the client’s ACEs, the associated short and long-term outcomes of those ACEs, and protective factors the client experienced.
Then, the paper will have a minimum of four (4) pages of content/body, not including the title page, reference page, and chart of developmental factors and linkages.
Formatted in APA style.
Citations should come from readings assigned in the course (the Berk textbook, CDC links, and/or the Felitti et al. (1997) study) and at least 1 additional scholarly source.
A minimum of 8 in-text citations are required in the paper.
The purpose of this assignment is three-fold:
To identify risk factors and ACEs,
To track the possible influence of these ACEs and risk factors over time by identifying associated developmental outcomes occurring in the short and long term, and
To identify protective factors and signs of resilience.
The assignment has two parts:
Part 1: Review the Kristopher case study. Next, create a chart that includes each developmental stage Kristopher has passed through (birth to present). Then, identify all of the following for each stage:
a) Risk factors and ACEs Kristopher experienced in each developmental stage, and any other concerns you have for/about Kristopher
b) Short and longer-term outcomes associated with the risk factors and/or ACEs, and
c) Protective factors and/or evidence of resilience you see in Kristopher in each developmental stage and the case information.
Part 2: Compose a paper (minimum of 4 pages of content/body) that identifies realistic, protective factors and/or supports that could be put into place now to positively support and influence Kristopher’s development and level of resilience.The purpose of this assignment is three-fold:
To identify risk factors and ACEs,
To track the possible influence of these ACEs and risk factors over time by identifying associated developmental outcomes occurring in the short and long term, and
To identify protective factors and signs of resilience.
The assignment has two parts:
Part 1: Review the Kristopher case study. Next, create a chart that includes each developmental stage Kristopher has passed through (birth to present). Then, identify all of the following for each stage:
a) Risk factors and ACEs Kristopher experienced in each developmental stage, and any other concerns you have for/about Kristopher
b) Short and longer-term outcomes associated with the risk factors and/or ACEs, and
c) Protective factors and/or evidence of resilience you see in Kristopher in each developmental stage and the case information.
Part 2: Compose a paper (minimum of 4 pages of content/body) that identifies realistic, protective factors and/or supports that could be put into place now to positively support and influence Kristopher’s development and level of resilience.
Assignment Directions
Part 1 – Chart of Factors and Related Outcomes: When reading the following case study about 14-year-old Kristopher, keep in mind Berk (2018) chapters 1-6 and the past discussion forum about childhood abuse, neglect, and other ACEs. Starting with Kristopher’s prenatal development, develop a table or chart identifying:
Risk factors and/or ACEs Kristopher experienced in each stage, and other concerns you may have about Kristopher’s development.
Short and longer-term developmental outcomes (e.g., developmental delays, difficulty progressing through Erikson’s stages, attachment difficulties) displayed by Kristopher that are associated with the risk factors and ACEs you identified.
For each developmental stage, also list protective factors and/or signs of resilience you see in Kristopher and in the case information.
Notes: A sample chart is offered below. Students may use this sample chart or create their own version. In the chart, be sure to link the risk factors and ACEs you identify to short-term and longer-term developmental outcomes, as described in the text or other scholarly sources.
For example, consider a case study in which a person experienced childhood physical abuse:
What are the risk factors for experiencing physical abuse? Did this person experience any of those risk factors? If so, in what stage(s)? List the risk or ACE in each stage in which it occurred (e.g., if the person experienced physical abuse in early and middle childhood, you would list physical abuse in each of those stages).
Using this same example, and according to the readings, what are the short-term developmental outcomes associated with physical abuse? Identify which of these outcomes the person evidenced and list in the chart.
What are the longer-term developmental outcomes associated with physical abuse? Identify which of these outcomes the person evidenced and list in the chart. Also, what are you most concerned about happening in a future life stage?
Part 2 – Paper: After constructing and reflecting on the chart, identify and discuss realistic protective factors that could be introduced now to positively support and influence Kristopher’s level of resilience and current and future development. For example, you may want to recommend involvement in a range of prosocial extra-curricular activities. This makes sense, and be specific about which activities you think would help and why. Consider such issues as whether Kristopher’s family can afford the ones you’re recommending. Will the adults be required to participate or transport him to/from the activity? If so, would that be realistic for this specific family? Give it some thought and get creative!
Again, the focus in on what can be introduced now to support Kristopher’s development. Do not discuss what could have helped in the past if we could go back in time.Assignment Directions
Part 1 – Chart of Factors and Related Outcomes: When reading the following case study about 14-year-old Kristopher, keep in mind Berk (2018) chapters 1-6 and the past discussion forum about childhood abuse, neglect, and other ACEs. Starting with Kristopher’s prenatal development, develop a table or chart identifying:
Risk factors and/or ACEs Kristopher experienced in each stage, and other concerns you may have about Kristopher’s development.
Short and longer-term developmental outcomes (e.g., developmental delays, difficulty progressing through Erikson’s stages, attachment difficulties) displayed by Kristopher that are associated with the risk factors and ACEs you identified.
For each developmental stage, also list protective factors and/or signs of resilience you see in Kristopher and in the case information.
Notes: A sample chart is offered below. Students may use this sample chart or create their own version. In the chart, be sure to link the risk factors and ACEs you identify to short-term and longer-term developmental outcomes, as described in the text or other scholarly sources.
For example, consider a case study in which a person experienced childhood physical abuse:
What are the risk factors for experiencing physical abuse? Did this person experience any of those risk factors? If so, in what stage(s)? List the risk or ACE in each stage in which it occurred (e.g., if the person experienced physical abuse in early and middle childhood, you would list physical abuse in each of those stages).
Using this same example, and according to the readings, what are the short-term developmental outcomes associated with physical abuse? Identify which of these outcomes the person evidenced and list in the chart.
What are the longer-term developmental outcomes associated with physical abuse? Identify which of these outcomes the person evidenced and list in the chart. Also, what are you most concerned about happening in a future life stage?
Part 2 – Paper: After constructing and reflecting on the chart, identify and discuss realistic protective factors that could be introduced now to positively support and influence Kristopher’s level of resilience and current and future development. For example, you may want to recommend involvement in a range of prosocial extra-curricular activities. This makes sense, and be specific about which activities you think would help and why. Consider such issues as whether Kristopher’s family can afford the ones you’re recommending. Will the adults be required to participate or transport him to/from the activity? If so, would that be realistic for this specific family? Give it some thought and get creative!
Again, the focus in on what can be introduced now to support Kristopher’s development. Do not discuss what could have helped in the past if we could go back in time.