Be sure that your submission addresses the following critical elements:  Compa

Be sure that your submission addresses the following critical elements:
 Compare the research methodologies used in your chosen studies and explain why these methodologies were used over other methodologies. In other
words, in your comparison you could include why methodologies are informed by the hypothesis created by the author of the study. Be sure to support
your response with examples and support from the chosen studies.
 Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not valid. Be sure to support your response with examples and
support from the chosen studies.
 Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not reliable. Be sure to support your response with examples and
support from the chosen studies.
 Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not credible. Be sure to support your response with examples and
support from the chosen studies.
 Explain how the results of your chosen studies appropriately support the conclusions that were reached. If the results do not support the conclusions
reached, briefly describe the more appropriate conclusions given the results presented. In other words, you could consider the results section and how
the authors used that information to reach their conclusions, even if their claims are inaccurate.
For more detailed instructions, see the following steps:
1. First copy and paste the title page and reference list from Milestone One into a new document. Hopefully the running head copies over as well, but if it
does not, add that back in. Be sure to address any feedback from your instructor on these sections so you have the best version moving forward.
2. Next, begin the new narrative by comparing and contrasting the research methodologies from the three articles. In Milestone One, you simply described
the articles. Now you will begin to integrate them into a larger discussion, using material you have learned in this class. How are the methodologies
similar? How are they different? Why might the authors have made these methodological choices, given their stated hypotheses? Be sure to incorporate
specific points from all three articles to support your arguments.
3. Then, discuss each article in terms of reliability and validity. Do you think their methodology leads to credible results? Why or why not? It is certainly
possible that you will reach different conclusions for some of the articles. Talk about how the individual methodology led you to those conclusions. Again,
be sure to incorporate specific points from all three articles to support your arguments. Also make sure that for each article, you talk specifically about
reliability, validity, and overall credibility (That is, should we trust these results? Beyond reliability, are the results logical? Current? Anything else that
might concern or impress you?).
4. Close by discussing the conclusions reached by each of the articles. Again, you described this in Milestone One but now you are using the information
developed in Milestone Two to critique the conclusions. Are those conclusions supported? If so, what specifically makes you believe the conclusions are
valid? Are those conclusions not supported, given the information provided above? If so, cite specific reasons as to why we should question the given
conclusions