OPEN AND SEE FILES ATTACHED FOR CLARITY WITH TAKS AND BETTER UNDERSTANDIN You wi

OPEN AND SEE FILES ATTACHED FOR CLARITY WITH TAKS AND BETTER UNDERSTANDIN
You will be develop a project aimed at answering this question:
RQ 1: Social Exclusion, Cultural Orientation, and Political Radicalisation
In this study, we are going to investigate if social exclusion affects individuals’ political radical action. Also, we are going to investigate if the relationship between social exclusion and individuals’ intention to show radical actions would be moderated by differences in the individual cultural orientations. You should be able to manipulate the IV (Social Exclusion vs. Social Inclusion) and measure another IV (Cultural Orientation, e.g., individualism/collectivism or Power Distance) and a DV (Radical Political Action).
Assessment
The Quantitative Project Report will be a write-up of the design and analysis of your experiment. While the information regarding your experiment will be similar with other members of your group, your individual interpretation of the experiment is what is being assessed.
To be absolutely clear, your success in this assignment does not depend on a great experimental design or finding evidence to support your hypotheses. Rather, your success depends on your ability to come up with testable hypotheses, discuss your experimental design and sample’s ability to test those hypotheses, and whether or not your analysis is appropriate to test those hypotheses.
include hypothesis, measures and scenaros
Title
This should be your main research question.
Abstract (up to 150 words)
The abstract should be a brief summary of the reasons for doing the research, the methodology, the results and the conclusion.
Introduction (approx. 600 words)
An introduction provides an overview of the recent empirical and theoretical work in the field. Briefly describe your research question, and provide a brief justification for why it is important to study. Then draw on existing literature and explain the hypothesis or hypotheses you wish to test. Be sure to include multiple citations for each hypothesis and reference them in your bibliography.
Methods (approx. 700 words)
In this section, you should address the following points:
Participants
• Number of individuals who participated
• Basic demographic information (e.g., including gender, mean age, and ethnic composition).
Design
• Describe the factors of your design, the levels of each factor, and also clarify whether the study employed a between- or a within-participants design
• Explain the random assignment to groups
Procedure
• Detail the procedures you used in the study (e.g., what participants were asked to do, including a description of all materials participants were exposed to).
• Clarify whether the whole sample or only a subset of your sample (i.e., participants in a particular condition) was exposed to certain materials/stimuli (and provide an overview of these in the Appendix).
Measures
• Describe all measures used in your experiment and indicate clearly whether they were used as the DV, IV(s), or manipulation check.
• Include a detailed description of all answer scales with labels of the scale end-points and associated numeric scores (e.g., 1 = not at all, 7 = very much).
Analysis and Results (approx. 400 words)
While you may choose an analysis method of your choice from those explored in the course, we encourage you to carry out a regression analysis with a moderation effect. This method is particularly suited to the data you are working with, and detailed guidance on how to run the analysis, report and interpret the results can be found in the relevant lecture slides (week 24). Also, please complete Week 24 workshop exercise which would be helpful for your understanding.
In alternative, you may carry out a two-way ANOVA. To do so, you should have two independent variables (each measured as categorical variables with two levels), and at least one continuous dependent variable (beware that this may mean you would have to recode one or more of your independent variables!).
You should report the results in a table showing the relevant coefficients and levels of significance. You should also provide an interpretation of the coefficients and evaluate whether an effect is significant (p < .05) or not significant (p ≥ .05), and indicate whether your results are in line with the aim of your study and your expectations. Format all statistics in line with the APA guidelines. Use two decimal places for all statistics – except for p values, which should be reported with three decimal places. Report precise p values (e.g., “p = .056”, with the exception of values smaller than .001, which should be reported as “p < .001”. Provide an interpretation of all significant results and indicate whether they are in line with the aim of your study and your expectations. Discussion (approx. 400 words) Summarise your findings and interpret your results against the psychological theory and research you based your strategy/strategies on, and your expectations. If your findings are in line with your expectations, discuss their implications. If you failed to find the expected effects, speculate why. Reflection (approx. 250 words) Reflect on your experience. What went well? What did not go so well? Is there anything you would do differently next time? • This section should focus on METHODOLOGICAL POINTS, such as your measurement of key variables, your questionnaire structure, your experimental design, your control and treatment conditions, and your sample. • PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ABOUT YOUR TOPIC, YOUR RESEARCH QUESTION, OR YOUR HYPOTHESES HERE. Bibliography References and in-text citations should be formatted in APA 7th guidance (see below two websites). Appendix Your appendix must include: • Your Qualtrics questionnaire (which must show your experimental conditions) • The SPSS output of your analysis