Write: This Final Paper, an argumentative essay, will present research relating

Write: This Final Paper, an argumentative essay, will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the items below in separate sections with new headings for each.
In your paper,
Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph.
Conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solutions to the problem. (For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing CenterLinks to an external site..)
Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence.
Show why this is a societal problem.
Provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
Construct an argument supporting your proposed solutions, considering multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution.
Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
Interpret statistical data from at least three peer-reviewed scholarly sources within your argument.
Discuss the validity, reliability, and any biases.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of these sources, pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. (You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources.)
Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution.
Provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution.
Explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. (It is important to consider all of society.)
Develop a conclusion for the last paragraphs of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. (For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Introductions & ConclusionsLinks to an external site. from the University of Arizona Global Campus Writing CenterLinks to an external site..)
Professor feedback
See annotations for more feedback
Overall, the paper takes an informational approach versus an argumentative approach. The thesis needed to be a concise declarative sentence that stated the issue and solution. The paper had a few areas that were unfocused and/or did not meet the assignment instructions. Use the assignment instruction to outline the paper. Doing so will ensure all the requirements are met.
Go beyond providing information and provide some analysis, evaluation, and justification.
For the length of paper it might be better to focus just on a single topic such as literacy.
There is still time to use the feedback and resubmit to improve the grade
( 1.92 / 3.00) Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide a clear introduction paragraph with a thesis statement and a conclusion paragraph. Significant details are missing.
Comments:
The thesis statement within the introduction paragraph is not clearly evident. Strive to write a more direct and concise thesis statement so the reader can clearly ascertain the purpose of the research paper. The conclusion and related outcomes do not summarize key points in the paper or relate to the introduction.
( 2.56 / 4.00) Describes Background Information of Global Societal Issue
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe background information of the global societal issue; however, the description does not address how the issue developed, reasons why this is a societal issue, and/or perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations on the issue; significantly underdeveloped; and entirely unclear.
( 3.84 / 6.00) Constructs Argument with Evidence Supporting Proposed Solution
Below Expectations – Attempts to construct an argument of the global societal issue with limited supportive evidence that the proposed solution will benefit other disciplines or populations; however, the argument is significantly underdeveloped.
( 1.92 / 3.00) Interprets Statistical Evidence
Below Expectations – Attempts to interpret statistical evidence/data of at least three sources on the selected global societal issue; however, some sources may not be scholarly, and the interpretation is significantly underdeveloped and inaccurate.
( 1.92 / 3.00) Evaluates Ethical Issues and Outcomes of Proposed Solution
Below Expectations – Attempts to evaluate the ethical issues and outcomes in relation to the global societal issue chosen; however, the evaluation is significantly underdeveloped.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.
( 0.88 / 1.00) Written Communication: APA Formatting
Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.
( 1.00 / 1.00) Written Communication: Word Requirement
Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.
( 2.00 / 2.00) Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Need help Working on This or a Similar Assignment?

We specialize in custom-written, original papers. No prewritten essays here—order your plagiarism-free and AI-free paper today for guaranteed originality.